ARTICLE 25
of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Carol Steele
Coalition to Protect Public Housing, Chicago, IL
Article 25

Today I come to talk about what's happening in Chicago. My name is Carol and I was born on the land that eventually became Francis Cabrini Extension. I'm a single mother of three sons. Now I reside in public housing called Francis Cabrini Homes. My sons are neither gang members nor are they drugsellers. Back in 1955, I as a child watched them build what eventually became Francis Cabrini Extensions. Our family was one of the first families to move into the high rise in 1957. The reason I'm talking to you today is because I feel very strongly about my community and being displaced out of it.

Back in 1992, then-Chairman and Executive Director of Chicago Housing, Vince Lancy, introduced what he called Hope VI, supposed to be the revitalization of public housing. When they began to develop plans for our new schools, our new stores, we were joyful because we thought we were to benefit from such plans. But, as time went on we began to see these plans were not for the current residents of Cabrini. Because we were located on such prime land, a block from Michigan Avenue (what they call "the magnificent mile"), only 15 percent of our community people was going to be allowed to stay in that development.
So, we began to investigate and found out that Hope VI had to include residents' input before it could go forward. So what we decided to do was get a lawyer and put a lawsuit in against the Chicago Housing Authority and the city of Chicago so we wouldn't lose 3,600 units of public housing. We filed an injunction against them so they would allow us to sit at the table and plan for ourselves, because who knows better to plan for us than ourselves?

At this present time we are in negotiation with the Chicago Housing Authority to make sure that all our public housing is put back and redeveloped for the residents. Wardell Yotaghan and myself formed a coalition to protect public housing because it was not just happening to Cabrini Green, it was happening to all of the public housing in the city of Chicago that was around prime land.

As our coalition became stronger, more and more people began to get more involved, we began to find out that it wasn't just Chicago, it was happening in a lot of other states that were located in prime areas.

We believe a wide variety of people will become homeless due to the Hope VI program. We also believe Congress OCRA 202 is vouchering out tenants, which will also make thousands of people homeless.

They are telling us that they are going to give us Section 8 vouchers, so we can move. However, out of every five families that go out there and look for an apartment in Chicago, there is only one apartment available.

The 1937 Housing Act calls for replacement of every unit of housing that they tear down. Since 1996 they have suspended that law. So, we say we want all the buildings to be rehabilitated because a standing building is guaranteed housing for people, not an empty promise of a Section 8 housing voucher for housing that does not exist.


Chandra Almond
Coalition for the Homeless, Chicago, IL
Article 25

Hello, I'm Chandra, and I'm from the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless. I was born in Chicago, I was married, I had six kids.
In 1991, my previous husband cut me and abused me, and I took my children and went as far away as I could get. I ended up in a shelter on the north side where I spent a week. It was demeaning and despicable how they treated grown people. They made you share the food you bought with your own money with the staff and then you had to sleep on mats on the floor. I had just had a baby two weeks before but they still made me leave for two hours a day no matter how bad the weather was. It was like they just didn't give a damn about the people who stayed there. I was hurt so I left and stayed with my sister.
In 1993, I decided to go back home with my husband and try it again, and things went smooth for a while, but then everything fell apart. I left home again and met a man named Fred who I stayed with for three years. We didn't have any money so we lived "on the hills" as we used to call it. We built a hut to live in to protect us from the weather, and sometimes we lived in abandoned buildings and under viaducts. During the day, we would go scrapping for metal to make money.

Then I found out that I was having a child. I found myself confused. I didn't want a child at this time in my life. I felt I couldn't take care of a child living the way I was, but we talked about it, and we decided to move in together and it lasted about five months. Then Fred left because he couldn't take it. But at least two good things came out of that relationship - my son and my GED.

After I had my child, the state child protection agency took him away and I went looking for Fred. I found him under Lower Wacker Drive, a series of underground streets in downtown Chicago. Many homeless people who do not like the shelters live there and many of them have jobs nearby and also scrap for metal. The people who stay there are like a community of people who care for each other. I lived there myself until the summer of 1997.
Every Monday for the past year and a half, the city has done a "sweep" of Lower Wacker Drive. They call it "street cleaning" but they harass the homeless people down there, call them names and throw their belongings away.

On Monday, December 1, 1997 - a few weeks before Christmas and the day before President Clinton was coming to town - the city caravan blocked off the street and took absolutely everything. They took the homeless peoples' clothes, books, blankets, personal items, everything they had. The leader of the caravan called the homeless people many names, like "nigger," "dog," and "animal."

The city had moved some of the people from Lower Wacker Drive into a YMCA on the far west side, but many people left the YMCA because they could not afford to start paying rent and needed to get back downtown to work.

The city - and the country - want to hide the homelessness because it is bad for tourism. But there are between 40,000 and 80,000 homeless people in the city of Chicago alone. The largest group is children under nine years old. We all need jobs and permanent housing.

What my new husband Bo and I want for our children is a decent life which means jobs at a decent wage and a home.



Mercedes Osario
Elizabeth STEPS with Power, Elizabeth, NJ
Article 25

Hi, my name is Mercedes. I'm from Elizabeth, New Jersey. I'd like to tell you a little bit about myself. I am a formerly homeless mother of two. I was on public assistance when I had my first son at a very young age. Up until that time I thought that getting a job was my answer to all my problems of poverty, so I went out in search of a job. I found one that did not pay me a living wage. I brought my first pay stub in to my case worker. My Medicaid and food stamps were cut. So I could not no longer afford to pay for my food, clothe my children, and pay rent. I became homeless; I was in a shelter for a year.

I'm no longer in a shelter. I live in a two-bedroom apartment with ten people, because in the city of New Jersey there is no affordable housing. A one-bedroom can be anywhere between $500 to $600 rent. So I share this apartment with ten people to make it.

I ask the government to tell me, you know, how I can take away my daughter's pain, that I can't afford to give her her own room, or to put a roof over her head. Yesterday there was a cut-off of welfare - temporary rental assistance - for hundreds of people in New Jersey. The government gave them a hand: a three-month extension. In three months, these people will be homeless anyway. That does not solve the solution. There is no affordable housing in New Jersey. The five years I've lived there, Section 8 has been closed. Housing lists are miles long, before you can even get on them. It'll be years before I'd be able to get affordable housing for my children. We are in the process of being evicted now because we can no longer pay our rent, because we pay $675, not including heat and hot water.


Synthesizing comments
Article 25

Wardell Yotaghan
Coalition to Protect Public Housing, Chicago, IL

Today I would like to start with the parable of No Room in the Inn. Mary had no place to give birth to her child because she and her husband were poor.
There are 40 million homeless people; men, women, children., in the US. Of these, 25% are children. That means that there are 500,000 homeless children. Children of nine years represent the fastest growing homeless population in America. There are 15 million households in need of federal housing assistance and only 4.5 million receive it. Over 60 years ago America was faced with a similar housing shortage. Millions of families and single individuals were living in America's streets or paying 50-75% of their wages for substandard housing. Homelessness and poverty were looked down upon by the US Congress and President Theodore Roosevelt in 1937 to be a festering sore on the face of America. Despite failing economic conditions and the Depression era, they made it their mission to eradicate the housing problem facing the economically disadvantaged. Thus they created the US Housing Act of 1937. And in so doing, millions of families and individuals moved off the streets, out of substandard housing and into federally subsidized homes.

Economic conditions in America today are in sharp contrast to 1937. The motives of the US congress today are different, eliminating housing for the poor. If passed, this will cripple the poor physically and psychologically . With presidential support, the US Congress has brought an attack on the poor. This war could end with millions of men, women, children starving, and for once in American history, living in the streets. This is a war. Congressional funding reduction of the past 20 years has created de facto demolition of public housing across the nation.

The last congress created a mandate to demolish 100,000 units of public housing nationwide. Between the cities of Chicago and New York, 19, 000 units of public housing will be demolished and 450, 000 men, women, and children are being forced to leave their homes and rely upon Section 8 certificates or vouchers to find placement of housing. Section 8 or other public housing programs, going back to the Public Housing Act of 1937, gives people vouchers to help them pay rent. Section 8 is a subsidy, not a department. Those who cannot get Section 8 are unable to find suitable replacement housing. According to US of Department of Housing a year ago, there are 61, 000 families in Chicago on the housing subsidy waiting list. Of them, 15, 000 men, women, and children are homeless every night, competing for 5,500 shelter beds. The remaining 9,500 continue to sleep in our parks, our streets, under bridges and viaducts.
In Chicago the public housing is built in the most valuable land in the country. Real estate developers are lobbying congress to knock down the buildings so they can build other buildings. Poor people in public housing are already affected by welfare reform without the existence of a living wage job . Thus, in my opinion, I suggest that you find the United States guilty of human rights violations on a daily basis.


Kay Marley
Oberlin, OH
Article 25

Hello, my name is Kay. I am from Oberlin, Ohio. I am an epileptic. I have been an epileptic for 46 years. I was told for years, "You can't go to college, you're an epileptic" and "You can't drive a car, you're an epileptic...." So finally I got mad and said, "You watch me!"

I graduated from Lorain County Community College in 1973. I was hired in the records office at the Community College and worked for 12 years. My boss hired me knowing that I was an epileptic. My employment there ended for reasons that I never understood.


As I then looked for a job in Lorain County I saw the old fears and prejudices that face epileptics and diabetics. I had to make the decision to tell the truth about my condition and several times I saw my application for jobs go into the wastepaper basket. I moved into public housing in 1987. Soon after I went on Social Security Implement as a result of my condition. I was injured in a greenhouse severely.

Since 1989, since being diagnosed with epilepsy, the special medication I need has been covered by Medicaid. In May of this year I was refused the medication that prevents me from having seizures. The pharmacist told me that because I have a Medicaid card that I would not be given the effective medication, which I have been using for years, but would be given a generic substitute. I have tried in the past to use the generic brand but it is not strong enough and does not stop the seizures related to my epilepsy. When you have a Medicaid card, the state labels you, saying, "You have a Medicaid card - you get generic medication, whether it works or not." I started using Medicaid about two years ago, on the generic medication.

At that time, after about two days of using the generic medication I started having a series of seizures. This caused me to lose my driving privileges in Ohio. My license has since been restored but still requires recertification each year. In essence, without proper medication, the seizures will occur, and then I will be unable to work or to get around to any of my doctors or grocery stores or any aspect of my daily routine.

When I was told in May of this year that I had to requalify for the non-generic medication that I had been on I had only a few days of the medication left. To get more of it, they would charge me $71. I was told first that the process would take a month. Then I was told it would take seven days. The pharmacist didn't have a fax machine.

I had to go to my doctor to get a "letter of medical necessity." He said that he wanted the original prescriptions back. The pharmacist would not do that. He would not fill the prescription as written but he did give me a ten-day supply and told me that it had been taken off the market. I had enough medication to last until June 9th.

The lady at the Lorain County Human Services Office in charge of the Medical Department told me to get another letter from my neurologist, Dr. Good, in Cleveland. He can't understand why Lorain County is so backwards. In this letter he stated the medical necessity for the name brand medication rather than the generic and to get a prescription for the medication saying "fill as prescribed." I found a pharmacist in Oberlin who would fax these to the state capital, which they did.

I felt well enough to go through this process. I have found people willing to take time and help me. So far I have not missed a day of medication with the effective brand name. But I am one of the lucky ones. What a nightmare this new provision of the welfare changes has caused.



Krista Ziebarth
Idaho Hunger Action Council, Boise, ID
Article 25

Hi, my name is Krista. I'm with Idaho Citizen Network and Idaho Hunger Action Council, and I've never been this far and I'm kind of nervous so please bear with me. I came here today because there has been a 77% reduction in the number of families on welfare in Idaho since January of 1996. I don't know what happened, but I'm here to say I'm worse off.

I am 25 years old and I have two sons - Kyle and Spencer. I have severe epilepsy and have all sorts of seizures. I have been on and off welfare for the past six years. For one of those years, I was homeless, living in a place called Community House. And I moved in when my son was two days old.

I first heard about the welfare reform when they cut me off. In Idaho, they disqualify you for cash assistance if you receive Social Security disability. Since I receive disability benefits because of my epilepsy, I lost all of my state cash assistance under this new rule. Idaho is only one of three states in America to enact this "reform."

When I was first cut off, I was left high and dry. Luckily I had an extra pair of diapers. I started getting about $204 in child support from Kyle's father. This small amount of money helped replace AFDC welfare, but Kyle's father lost his job, I lost that support. We were barely scraping by.

Now, we have to get help from food banks, but many of the food banks only allow you to go once every two or three months. I was down to one meal a day, if that. I try to save all of our food for my children, because I cannot let them go without. I still can't afford clothes, everything they wear is hand-me-downs. My family has disregarded me, because of being on welfare. Now that I am cut off, I do not have the extra help or moral support from them.

Welfare reform put me deeper in debt when it is supposed to help people. People with disabilities have been cut off with no alternatives or places to go. I do not think this is fair because I was not told I would lose my benefits until the last minute and with my disability I am trapped in poverty.

I want to find a way to work. I want job training and job placement for people with special needs. But not low-wage prison-like jobs. But, even that is really hard. I once worked at a fast food restaurant. I do not mind the work, but they watched over me like I was in prison because of my epilepsy. This stress and pressure made me have seizures and I had to quit. Working would be great if was a place that really understood and respected people with disabilities.

We need your help. Idaho is doing nothing to help families like mine and aren't even tracking what is happening to thousands of families who were cut off. I do not understand how anyone can call this program successful.
Would you please come to Idaho and hold these hearings?


David Cooper
New Jerusalem Laura, Philadelphia, PA
Article 25

My name is David and this is Charles. First I want to give it out to God for allowing me to be here for truly, if it wasn't His will, then I don't think I would be here today. Today is my 75th day of recovery from drug and alcohol addiction. Charles and I both are residents in the New Jerusalem recovery program in Philadelphia. Charles is my house manager and he's here to give me a little support.

I am here today because I need to address the President, the nation, and the world on the human rights of people like myself to recover from addiction. The right to treatment from addiction is the right to be healthy. Unfortunately, it is often impossible in this country for poor people to gain access to both treatment programs or the ability to support themselves while in treatment.

My first day of recovery marked the end of a two-year struggle to find a program which would accept me. I am from Wilmington, Delaware. For two years, I called treatment programs after treatment programs, trying to enter into recovery. I knew I had a serious problem, but I couldn't find any programs where I could get help. Everywhere I called was either full or required insurance that I didn't have, so my addiction got worse.

Finally, through a church-run program called CTAC, "Churches Taking a Corner," I learned about a treatment center in Philadelphia that would accept me. I had to leave my wife and two children in Wilmington, but I jumped at that opportunity. Today I am grateful that I found a program but I know a lot of people who are still using because they can't get into a program. I am able to think clearly, make conscious decisions, and see the world as it is. However, I am angry that I was denied recovery for so long. Because without recovery, I was unable to take care of my family, because I was not able to take care of myself. Now I'm on the right track, but my family went through a lot of pain. We lost a lot of time.

There is not enough funding in the budget for rehabilitation from substance abuse. When addicts seek help and can find no openings, they become discouraged, continue using, and do whatever they need to do to medicate their addiction, even if this means they must rob, kill, or steal. This breaks down our community.
While I have been in full-time recovery, I have depended upon welfare to meet my needs. I get $102 every two weeks. Of this, $75 goes towards rent, which leaves me with $32 extra to spend during those two weeks. Now, how am I supposed to survive? This government is just as sick as an addict - it is in total denial.

In fact, I am one of the lucky ones. Most of the other residents in my program don't receive welfare assistance. Every time they apply, they are denied for one reason or another, even though they are poor, and need the money. Having no money hurts their chances of recovery, since the program requires people to focus full-time on their recovery. People are not supposed to work for the first four months of their recovery. But if they can't get welfare, how can they not work? And if they have to work, how can they focus full-time on their recovery?

We as recovering people and people who want to recover from addiction need this nation to recognize our right to treatment, our right to be healthy, so that we can be productive citizens in our families and in this society. I believe in order to fully recover, we must first recover the nation that made us sick.

Testimonies - Article 26 Violations